Module 1: Legal Foundations and Cooperative Formation
Choose the right legal structure, understand the Colombian regulatory framework for energy communities, and draft an initial set of bylaws.
6 hours Phase 1 · Diagnostic
By the end of this module
The participant will be able to:
- Distinguish between an association, a cooperative, and an SAS as legal structures for a community energy project.
- Explain the applicable Colombian regulatory framework (Ley 79/1988, Ley 454/1998, Decreto 2236 of 2023, CREG Resolution 101 072 of 2023).
- Apply the registration steps with Supersolidaria and RUCE to a real case in their own community.
- Draft a preliminary version of cooperative bylaws tailored to their territorial context.
- Assess when a Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC) process is required and what implications it has for the project timeline and governance.
Session topics
Expand each topic to see the full content
Topic 1: The Colombian cooperative framework — Ley 79/1988 and Ley 454/1998
Ley 79 of 1988 is the framework law for the cooperative sector in Colombia: it defines what a cooperative is (a non-profit associative enterprise in which workers or users are simultaneously the contributors and the managers), establishes the universal principles of cooperativism (voluntary and open membership, democratic member control, member economic participation, autonomy and independence, education, cooperation among cooperatives, and concern for community), and sets the minimum requirements for incorporation: at least 20 founding members for a first-tier cooperative, articles of incorporation, bylaws, and recognition of legal status.
Ley 454 of 1998 created the framework for the solidarity economy as a sector distinct from the traditional capitalist economy, established the Superintendency of the Solidarity Economy (Supersolidaria) as the oversight and control body, and defined the Guarantee Fund for financial cooperatives.
For an energy community, choosing the cooperative model means committing to internal democracy (one member, one vote, regardless of capital contributed) and to ongoing member education — it is not merely a way to organize legally but a model of economic governance. Supersolidaria requires periodic reporting, a statutory auditor once a certain asset threshold is reached, and compliance with a solvency and transparency regime. Understanding this from the outset prevents surprises as the cooperative grows and comes under greater regulatory scrutiny.
Topic 2: Comparing legal structures — Association vs. Cooperative vs. SAS
Not every energy community needs to be set up as a cooperative. An association (governed by the Civil Code and Decreto 2150 of 1995) is the simplest and fastest structure to establish: it only requires articles of incorporation and straightforward bylaws, does not mandate capital contributions, and is ideal in the early stages when the community is still validating its business model and does not manage significant assets. However, associations have more limited access to structured financing and less recognition from financial institutions and CREG for larger-scale projects.
A cooperative offers robust democratic governance and access to tax benefits under the solidarity economy regime (partial income tax exemption when surpluses are reinvested in the education and solidarity fund), but requires more incorporation paperwork, Supersolidaria oversight, and a participatory organizational culture that not every community is ready to sustain from day one.
An SAS (Simplified Joint-Stock Company, Ley 1258 of 2008) is a for-profit commercial entity with a very agile incorporation process (even by private document), flexible capital structures, and appeal for attracting external investors or creating a commercial vehicle that provides services to the cooperative (for example, an SAS for operations and maintenance of the assets, owned by the cooperative).
The central pedagogical recommendation of this module is that many successful Colombian energy communities use a hybrid model: an association or cooperative as the base for community governance, and optionally a satellite SAS for commercial or operational functions that require greater agility.
Topic 3: The new energy communities framework — Decreto 2236 of 2023 and CREG 101 072
Decreto 2236 of 2023 from the Ministry of Mines and Energy introduced for the first time in Colombia a formal definition of 'energy community': a group of natural and/or legal persons who voluntarily associate to develop, operate, or benefit from generation, storage, energy efficiency, or demand management projects, with the goal of generating social, environmental, and economic benefits for their members and their territory.
The decree recognizes four typologies: energy communities for energy formalization, for economic and social reactivation, citizen energy communities, and energy communities for closing access gaps — each with distinct eligibility criteria and funding sources (FENOGE, royalty revenues, international cooperation).
CREG Resolution 101 072 of 2023 develops the technical and regulatory aspects: how these projects connect to the grid, how surplus energy is measured and compensated (net metering and net billing schemes), and what technical requirements a project must meet to be recognized as an energy community by the grid operator.
It is crucial that community leaders understand that recognition as an 'energy community' under Decreto 2236 is an additional and subsequent step after incorporating the base legal entity (cooperative, association, or SAS): first the organization is incorporated, then its sectoral recognition is requested.
Topic 4: Registration with Supersolidaria and RUCE
Once the cooperative (or association) has been incorporated by public deed or private document as applicable, and has obtained legal status, the next step is enrollment in the Unified Registry of Energy Communities (RUCE), administered by the Ministry of Mines and Energy. This registry is the gateway to the benefits of Decreto 2236: access to FENOGE funds, prioritization in international cooperation calls, and formal recognition by the grid operator for connection purposes.
The RUCE enrollment process requires:
- A copy of the bylaws and the certificate of existence and legal representation.
- A preliminary technical document for the energy project.
- Evidence of community participation in the project design.
- The list of founding members with their role within the organization.
In parallel, cooperatives must register and report periodically to Supersolidaria, which requires annual financial statements, assembly minutes, and — depending on asset size — an external statutory auditor. Completing both registrations (RUCE and Supersolidaria) from the outset, rather than treating them as belated formalities, saves months of delay when the community later seeks financing or external investment.
Topic 5: Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC) in indigenous and Afro-descendant territories
When a community energy project is located in an indigenous reservation, an Afro-descendant community council territory, or any recognized ethnic territory, the Colombian Constitution (Article 330) and ILO Convention 169 require a Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC) process before initiating any works or projects that could affect the territory.
This is not a pro-forma procedure: it is a fundamental right requiring the ethnic community to participate from the project design stage itself, with complete information, in their own language, under their own decision-making processes (assemblies, councils of elders, etc.), and with the real possibility of saying no.
It is essential for the facilitators of this course to convey that FPIC should not be seen as a bureaucratic obstacle to 'overcome', but rather as an opportunity to build legitimacy and long-term social sustainability for the project. Ignoring or simulating this process has led, in Colombia, to the judicial paralysis of energy infrastructure projects through constitutional injunctions (tutelas).
Certification of the existence of ethnic communities in the project's area of influence is requested from the National Prior Consultation Authority (DANCP) under the Ministry of the Interior, and the process can take between 3 and 12 months depending on the territorial complexity.
International reference
What worked in another context and what is transferable to Colombia
Energie Samen (Netherlands) — the model bylaws template
Energie Samen is the national federation of energy cooperatives in the Netherlands, bringing together more than 600 local initiatives and representing over 100,000 individual members. One of its most valuable contributions to the international cooperative movement is the development of model bylaws that serve as a standardized template for new cooperatives, drastically reducing the time and legal cost of incorporation while preserving essential democratic principles.
The Energie Samen model is structured around three pillars:
- Clarity of purpose — the bylaws establish from the very first article that the cooperative's purpose is the collective benefit of the community and not the maximization of individual returns, which protects the organization from being captured by purely financial interests as it grows.
- Flexibility in capital structure — they allow different classes of contributions (participation certificates) that entitle holders to a proportional share of surpluses, while preserving the one-vote-per-member principle at the general assembly, completely decoupling political power from economic power.
- Orderly exit mechanisms — clear clauses about what happens when a member withdraws or when the cooperative dissolves, preventing costly legal disputes.
A distinctive element of the Dutch model is the inclusion of a statutory 'new projects committee', which allows the cooperative to incubate new energy initiatives under the same legal umbrella without having to incorporate a new entity each time — something especially relevant for Colombian communities that may want to scale from a single community solar project to multiple projects (solar, energy efficiency, electric mobility) under a single parent cooperative.
Discussion questions
- Which elements of the Energie Samen model could be directly adapted to the Colombian context, and which would conflict with Ley 79/1988 or Decreto 2236?
- In your community, how would you handle the tension between attracting differentiated capital contributions (some members can contribute more) and maintaining the one-vote-per-member principle?
- Would a statutory 'new projects committee' make sense in your territory, thinking about the future growth of the energy community beyond the initial solar or energy efficiency project?
- What member exit mechanism would be fair while also protecting the financial stability of the collective project?
Module deliverable
The output of this exercise feeds the cooperative's portfolio
Drafting cooperative bylaws
In groups of 4-5 people (ideally representing the same community or territory), participants must draft a preliminary version of the following articles of their bylaws, using a template provided by the facilitator:
- Corporate purpose (1 paragraph): What is the specific purpose of your energy community? It must include a reference to the Decreto 2236 typology you aspire to.
- Membership admission requirements (list of 3-5 requirements): Who can be a member? Is there a minimum contribution?
- Governing bodies (simple organizational chart): General Assembly, Board of Directors, Supervisory Board, Management.
- Economic regime (1 paragraph): How are surpluses determined and distributed?
- Grounds for withdrawal and expulsion (list): Under what conditions can a member leave or be expelled?
Each group presents its draft in 5 minutes and receives feedback from two peer groups and the facilitator (using the '2 stars and a wish' format: two strengths and one suggestion for improvement).
A revised and complete version of the draft bylaws (all 5 articles from the exercise, now refined with the feedback received), submitted in writing to the facilitator.
Spaced repetition: on the seventh day after the session, the course WhatsApp bot sends 3 review questions on the module's key concepts (difference between association/cooperative/SAS, what RUCE is, when FPIC applies), and on day 21 a shorter version is repeated to reinforce long-term retention.
Module rubric
The "Proficient" level is the minimum required for the graduation portfolio
| Criterion | Insufficient | Basic | Proficient | Outstanding |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Understanding of the legal framework | Cannot distinguish between an association, a cooperative, and an SAS | Distinguishes the structures but does not argue which suits their case | Correctly selects and justifies the legal structure for their community | Justifies the choice considering future scalability and the hybrid model |
| Quality of drafted bylaws | Articles incomplete or copied without adaptation | All articles present but generic | Articles adapted to the specific territorial context | Bylaws ready for attorney review, with precise language and internal consistency across articles |
| Application of the Energie Samen case | Unable to extract applicable lessons | Identifies 1 applicable lesson | Identifies 2-3 lessons and connects them to the Colombian context | Proposes a creative and feasible adaptation of the Dutch model |
| FPIC awareness | Does not identify whether their territory requires prior consultation | Identifies the requirement but does not know the process | Correctly explains the FPIC process and timelines | Integrates FPIC into the project's strategic timeline rather than treating it as an obstacle |
Further reading
- Decreto 2236 of 2023, Ministry of Mines and Energy (full text)
- CREG Resolution 101 072 of 2023
- Ley 79/1988 and Ley 454/1998 (cooperative and solidarity economy regime)
- Supersolidaria guide: 'How to Incorporate a Cooperative in Colombia' (2022)
- Ministry of the Interior Prior Consultation Directorate guide on the FPIC procedure
- Energie Samen model bylaws guide (translated and adapted for the course)
Links point to the official website of the entity that issues each regulation or document, not to a specific file. Course-specific materials (templates, fact sheets, protocols, and translated guides) are not public: they are delivered within the program's LMS and during in-person sessions.